What’s hip vs. what’s not: a look at fashion on Barney & Friends
I learned today that Cookie magazine hired The Sartorialist to document fashionable toddlers. The Sartorialist, as I’ve found out, is a popular fashion blogger from New York who ”documents every day adult style-setters from New York to Milan.” His page for Cookie, The Sartorialist Jr., will capture “junior style innovators” so we can see how the hippest kids dress. This sounds like good timing to me. You see, as part of my new getting ready in the morning routine for work, I let my son indulge in a few minutes (or more) of TV watching. Kill me, I need to shower. Our show of choice is usually Barney & Friends. What can I say? My son has gone the way of the purple dinosaur from hell. But the content of the show seems educational, the songs are cute enough and the kids have talent. It’s all midly tolerable except for one thing: the fashion. It’s like watching a kiddie version of Glamour Do’s and Don’ts list.
Somewhere between “I love you, you love me,” I think the children’s stylists went color blind. Or maybe it’s that their hair shears went the way of Britney (crazy.) I don’t know. But what I’m pretty sure of is that The Sartorialist doesn’t visit these parts. And as a mildy-fashionable mom trying to find fashion icons for my son in the wee hours of the morning, this task is looking daunting. Maybe it’s my fault that I let him watch Barney, but I see that smile and I can’t resist. So I’m left with a few questions. Why is there such a disconnect between Barney and Cookie? How is it that this venerable
show can be THAT removed from fashion reality? Television stylists of the world: aren’t there entry-level stylist jobs available on Barney? (I’m not saying we need Rachel Zoe.) Are the perks not good enough? C’mon, even Bert can make neon look cool (although he could really use an eyebrow wax.)
“Grandma, thanks for resizing your mumu for me.”
I’m not saying that these kids should look like Bratz dolls. But they also shouldn’t look like they are channeling The Brady Bunch (When I showed these photos to my husband he assumed they were from 1992. Oh, how wrong he was. 2005 to be exact.) Maybe the kids picked out their own clothes, which is fine, but then I think we need a disclaimer saying so.
“But mom, you said leggings were in.”
If you’ve read this far, you probably think (a) I have more money than Gwenyth to dress my child, (b) I’m incredibly shallow, or (c) I need a hobby. While (b) is true at times (I like to shop, what can I say), I don’t have time for (c), sorry. But I am definitely not Gwenyth. I am just a mom who wants to understand why stylists still think it’s ok to cut a boy’s hair like a female figure skater from the 1970s.
“Junior, meet Dorothy Hamill, hair icon.”
I don’t think kiddie fashion needs to be expensive (I typically get my son’s gear at Target, Old Navy on sale or local boutiques when they have their clearances), but shouldn’t it be current? Is it too much to ask that a child’s pants don’t look like 1960s wallpaper threw up on them?
“I don’t know why somebody made me wear this.”
My point is, I guess, if I have to watch this stuff because my son likes it, I’d like to get at least a few fashion tips in the process. The good news is that I can always just close my eyes and listen to the music. But that’s so not as educational.
Tags: Barney & Friends, The Sartorialist, Cookie magazine, The Sartorialist Jr., kid fashion, Dorothy Hamill
posted in Don't Know What to Make of This, Kid Fashion, Mom Rants, Fashion | 2 Comments























